Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
E85755
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
All labels observed (5)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T699422 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) Context triple: [New York v. United States (1992), laterCitedIn, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)]
-
A.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
-
C.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) Target entity description: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
A.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
-
C.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark decision ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
ⓘ
surface form:
Murphy v. NCAA
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) ⓘ
surface form:
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.
|
| arguedOn | December 4, 2017 ⓘ |
| challengedStatute | Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ⓘ |
| challengedStatuteAbbreviation | PASPA ⓘ |
| citation | 584 U.S. ___ (2018) ⓘ |
| concerns |
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
federalism ⓘ state-authorized sports gambling ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedOn | May 14, 2018 ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ |
| docketNumber | No. 16-476 ⓘ |
| effect |
Allowed individual U.S. states to legalize and regulate sports betting.
ⓘ
Significantly expanded states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine. ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress cannot issue direct orders to state legislatures to maintain prohibitions on sports gambling.
ⓘ
PASPA’s provision prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling is not severable from the rest of the statute. ⓘ The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment. ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal law ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act
ⓘ
scope of the anti-commandeering doctrine ⓘ |
| locationOfCourt | Washington, D.C. ⓘ |
| majorityJoinedBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ Elena Kagan ⓘ John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ Neil M. Gorsuch ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ |
| originatedFrom | Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association ⓘ |
| partlyJoinedBy | Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| petitioner |
Phil Murphy
ⓘ
surface form:
Philip D. Murphy
New Jersey, United States ⓘ
surface form:
State of New Jersey
|
| proceduralHistory |
New Jersey’s 2014 law partially repealing prohibitions on sports wagering was enjoined by lower federal courts under PASPA.
ⓘ
supreme court ⓘ
surface form:
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Third Circuit’s decision.
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ⓘ
surface form:
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld PASPA and the injunction against New Jersey’s law.
|
| relatedDoctrine | anti-commandeering doctrine ⓘ |
| relatedPrecedent |
New York v. United States (1992)
ⓘ
Printz v. United States ⓘ
surface form:
Printz v. United States (1997)
|
| replacedParty | Chris Christie ⓘ |
| respondent |
National Basketball Association
ⓘ
National Collegiate Athletic Association ⓘ National Football League ⓘ National Hockey League ⓘ MLB Commissioner’s Office ⓘ
surface form:
Office of the Commissioner of Baseball
United States of America ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| result | PASPA was struck down as unconstitutional. ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | sports betting regulation in the United States ⓘ |
| vote | 6–3 on the core anti-commandeering question ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) Description of subject: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
Referenced by (18)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.