Triple
T3980937
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association |
E85755
|
entity |
| Predicate | originatedFrom |
P409
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association was an earlier federal court case in New Jersey challenging the constitutionality of federal restrictions on state-authorized sports betting, which set the stage for the later Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA.
|
E403280
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | Statement: [Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, originatedFrom, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Context triple: [Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, originatedFrom, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
-
A.
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
B.
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University was a federal civil rights case in which a former Virginia Tech student sued her alleged rapists and the university under the Violence Against Women Act, setting the stage for the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Morrison on the limits of Congress’s Commerce Clause power.
-
C.
Grove City College v. Bell
Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
-
D.
Cannon v. University of Chicago
Cannon v. University of Chicago is a landmark 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized an implied private right of action for individuals to sue under Title IX for sex discrimination in federally funded education programs.
-
E.
NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel
The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel is the governing body within the NCAA responsible for reviewing, approving, and implementing rule changes across collegiate sports.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Triple: [Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, originatedFrom, Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
Generated description
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association was an earlier federal court case in New Jersey challenging the constitutionality of federal restrictions on state-authorized sports betting, which set the stage for the later Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Target entity description: Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association was an earlier federal court case in New Jersey challenging the constitutionality of federal restrictions on state-authorized sports betting, which set the stage for the later Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA.
-
A.
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
B.
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University was a federal civil rights case in which a former Virginia Tech student sued her alleged rapists and the university under the Violence Against Women Act, setting the stage for the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Morrison on the limits of Congress’s Commerce Clause power.
-
C.
Grove City College v. Bell
Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
-
D.
Cannon v. University of Chicago
Cannon v. University of Chicago is a landmark 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized an implied private right of action for individuals to sue under Title IX for sex discrimination in federally funded education programs.
-
E.
NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel
The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel is the governing body within the NCAA responsible for reviewing, approving, and implementing rule changes across collegiate sports.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69aed93908348190a26c8aaf4fab3e86 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aef9d9d8848190aa06eaf5d281fa16 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 4:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b54021ae388190a9518ea85b760736 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:01 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b541340dbc819081538517267f390f |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:06 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b54193105c81909e2a4e368aae36e8 |
completed | March 14, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:33 p.m.