|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
January 14, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
Administrative law case
Labor law case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:519_U.S._452
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1997
March 3, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
95-897
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Auer_et_al._v._Robbins_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:hasDoctrine
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Courts should defer to an agency's interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Auer v. Robbins (1997)
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie_(2019)
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
judicial deference to agency interpretations
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Auer_deference
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fair_Labor_Standards_Act
interpretation of Department of Labor regulations
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Auer_deference
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|