|
gptkb:Roper_v._Simmons
|
gptkb:Stanford_v._Kentucky
|
|
gptkb:Troy_Leon_Gregg_v._State_of_Georgia
|
Furman v. Georgia (in part)
|
|
gptkb:Stanley_Plan
|
federal courts
|
|
gptkb:R_v_R
|
marital rape exemption
|
|
gptkb:2018_Supreme_Court_verdict_on_women's_entry
|
ban on women aged 10-50 entering Sabarimala Temple
|
|
gptkb:Judge-made_law
|
higher courts
|
|
gptkb:Miller_v._California
|
gptkb:Memoirs_v._Massachusetts
|
|
gptkb:492_U.S._302
|
gptkb:Roper_v._Simmons
|
|
gptkb:California_Proposition_22_(2000)
|
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkb:Cavendish_Square_Holding_BV_v_Talal_El_Makdessi;_ParkingEye_Ltd_v_Beavis
|
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd
|
|
gptkb:Papachristou_v._City_of_Jacksonville
|
Jacksonville, Florida vagrancy ordinance
|
|
gptkb:Burmah_Oil_Company_Ltd_v_Lord_Advocate
|
gptkb:War_Damage_Act_1965
|
|
gptkb:International_Shoe_Co._v._Washington
|
Pennoyer v. Neff (in part)
|
|
gptkb:R_v_Kennedy_(No_2)_[2007]_UKHL_38
|
gptkb:R_v_Kennedy_(No_1)_[1999]
|
|
gptkb:Walton_v._Arizona
|
gptkb:Ring_v._Arizona
|
|
gptkb:Shabari_Mala_verdict
|
ban on entry of women aged 10-50
|
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_decision_in_Minor_v._Happersett_(1875)
|
gptkb:Nineteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe,_528_U.S._119_(1999)
|
California statute limiting welfare benefits for new residents
|
|
gptkb:Jim_Crow_laws_in_the_US_South
|
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
|
|
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_of_Southeastern_Pennsylvania_v._Casey
|
gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
|