|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Seminole_Rock_deference
|
|
gptkbp:amendedBy
|
gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie_(2019)
|
|
gptkbp:appliesTo
|
gptkb:public_administration
judicial review
interpretation of agency regulations
regulation is genuinely ambiguous
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
granting excessive power to administrative agencies
|
|
gptkbp:debatedBy
|
separation of powers
administrative state
|
|
gptkbp:doesNotApplyWhen
|
agency interpretation is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation
interpretation does not implicate agency's substantive expertise
interpretation is not the result of fair and considered judgment
interpretation does not reflect agency's authoritative or official position
|
|
gptkbp:firstArticulatedIn
|
1945
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Auer deference
|
|
gptkbp:meaning
|
courts defer to an agency's interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation
|
|
gptkbp:namedAfter
|
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins
|
|
gptkbp:originatedFromCase
|
gptkb:Bowles_v._Seminole_Rock_&_Sand_Co.
|
|
gptkbp:prohibits
|
gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie
|
|
gptkbp:reaffirms
|
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins_(1997)
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
gptkb:Skidmore_deference
|
|
gptkbp:supportedBy
|
judicial precedent
|
|
gptkbp:usedIn
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_courts
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins
gptkb:United_States_federal_administrative_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|