|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
588 U.S. ___
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 26, 2019
|
|
gptkbp:decision
|
vacated and remanded
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Amy_Coney_Barrett
gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
18-15
|
|
gptkbp:hasDoctrine
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Courts must exhaust all traditional tools of construction before deferring to agency interpretation
Auer deference is retained but limited
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Kisor v. Wilkie (2019)
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Auer_deference
interpretation of agency regulations
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
|
|
gptkbp:originatingCourt
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:James_L._Kisor
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
judicial review of agency interpretations
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins_(1997)
Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. (1945)
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Robert_Wilkie
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
veterans' benefits
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Auer_deference
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|