|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:appliesTo
|
judicial review of administrative agency interpretations of statutes
United States administrative law
statute is ambiguous and agency interpretation is reasonable
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
granting too much power to administrative agencies
|
|
gptkbp:doesNotApplyWhen
|
agency interpretation is unreasonable
statute is unambiguous
|
|
gptkbp:establishedBy
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:firstReleased
|
1984
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Chevron deference
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
administrative law jurisprudence in the United States
|
|
gptkbp:limitation
|
subsequent Supreme Court decisions
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:potentiallyOverruledBy
|
gptkb:Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Auer_deference
gptkb:Skidmore_deference
|
|
gptkbp:significantCase
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.,_467_U.S._837_(1984)
|
|
gptkbp:sometimesReferredAs
|
gptkb:Chevron_doctrine
gptkb:Chevron_test
|
|
gptkbp:standardizedBy
|
courts defer to agency interpretation if statute is ambiguous and agency interpretation is reasonable
|
|
gptkbp:step
|
determine whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue
if statute is ambiguous, determine whether agency's interpretation is reasonable
|
|
gptkbp:subjectOf
|
legal scholarship
judicial debate
|
|
gptkbp:supportedBy
|
promoting agency expertise and efficiency
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_administrative_law
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|