Statements (27)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:appliesTo |
judicial review of administrative agency interpretations of statutes
United States administrative law statute is ambiguous and agency interpretation is reasonable |
| gptkbp:criticizedFor |
granting too much power to administrative agencies
|
| gptkbp:doesNotApplyWhen |
agency interpretation is unreasonable
statute is unambiguous |
| gptkbp:establishedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:firstReleased |
1984
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
administrative law jurisprudence in the United States
|
| gptkbp:limitation |
subsequent Supreme Court decisions
|
| gptkbp:originatedIn |
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:potentiallyOverruledBy |
gptkb:Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Auer_deference
gptkb:Skidmore_deference |
| gptkbp:significantCase |
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.,_467_U.S._837_(1984)
|
| gptkbp:sometimesReferredAs |
gptkb:Chevron_doctrine
gptkb:Chevron_test |
| gptkbp:standardizedBy |
courts defer to agency interpretation if statute is ambiguous and agency interpretation is reasonable
|
| gptkbp:step |
determine whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue
if statute is ambiguous, determine whether agency's interpretation is reasonable |
| gptkbp:subjectOf |
legal scholarship
judicial debate |
| gptkbp:supportedBy |
promoting agency expertise and efficiency
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_federal_administrative_law
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Chevron deference
|