Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:arguedDate |
March 19, 1997
|
| gptkbp:citation |
Reno v. ACLU, 519 U.S. 452 (1997)
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist |
| gptkbp:date |
June 26, 1997
|
| gptkbp:decision |
landmark decision
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
The Communications Decency Act's anti-indecency provisions violate the First Amendment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
519 U.S. 452
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:officialName |
gptkb:Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
| gptkbp:pages |
452
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:Janet_Reno
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
internet free speech cases
|
| gptkbp:reporter |
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Communications_Decency_Act |
| gptkbp:volume |
519
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|