Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

GPTKB entity

Statements (35)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkbp:arguedDate March 25, 2014
gptkbp:citation 573 U.S. 682 (2014)
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date June 30, 2014
gptkbp:decision gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:Mardel,_Inc.
gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
Stephen Breyer (in part)
Elena Kagan (in part)
gptkbp:docketNumber 13-354
gptkbp:heldBy Closely held for-profit corporations can be exempt from regulations that violate their religious beliefs under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
Stephen Breyer (in part)
Elena Kagan (in part)
gptkbp:numberOfIssues Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act allows a for-profit company to deny contraception coverage to employees based on religious objections
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:Kathleen_Sebelius
gptkbp:predecessor gptkb:Zubik_v._Burwell
gptkbp:principle gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
gptkbp:relatedTo contraceptive mandate
gptkbp:subject religious liberty
health care law
corporate rights
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5