Properties (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
14-1418
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law case
Civil rights case |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
May 16, 2016 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
March 23, 2016
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Zubik v. Burwell
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Religious institutions
Health insurance policies Women's health access Religious organizations' health care mandates |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Clarence Thomas |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Becket_Fund_for_Religious_Liberty
gptkb:U.S._Department_of_Justice Constitutional law Religious freedom Health law Health care coverage Remanded to lower courts |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Affordable Care Act contraceptive mandate |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Influenced public policy discussions
Raised awareness of religious rights in healthcare Highlighted tension between health care and religious beliefs |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Set precedent for similar cases
Influenced future cases on religious liberty Clarified exemptions for religious organizations Court's_decision_was_a_per_curiam_opinion |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
Burwell
Little Sisters of the Poor |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial
Divided opinions |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corp._v._Burwell gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc._v._Sebelius |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Affordable Care Act
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Addressed the balance between religious liberty and women's health rights
|
| gptkbp:year |
2016
|