Statements (71)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
March 23, 2016
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
15-357
15-277 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Per curiam opinion
No definitive ruling on the merits |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
May 16, 2016 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh gptkb:Justice_Neil_Gorsuch gptkb:Justice_John_Roberts gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer Legal precedent for future cases Impact on public health policy Impact on employer-sponsored health plans Potential for increased litigation Access to contraceptive care Concerns over access to preventive care Concerns over administrative burdens Concerns over government overreach Concerns over religiously affiliated organizations Concerns over the role of faith in public policy Concerns over the separation of church and state Concerns over unequal treatment in healthcare Concerns over women's health Impact on healthcare access Impact on healthcare policy reform Impact on low-income women Implications for women's reproductive rights Importance of contraceptive access Importance of protecting women's health rights Need for a balanced approach to healthcare access Need for clarity in religious exemption laws Need for clear guidelines on religious exemptions Need for comprehensive healthcare coverage Need for equitable access to healthcare Need for protections against discrimination Potential for discrimination against women Religious liberty implications Role of government in healthcare Concerns over the implications for future legislation Importance of women's autonomy in healthcare decisions Balance between religious freedom and women's rights |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
15-354
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Future cases on religious exemptions
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Zubik v. Burwell
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Contraceptive mandate exemptions
Religious organizations' contraceptive coverage |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor
gptkb:Burwell |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
First Amendment rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Religious freedom and contraceptive coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Court did not issue a definitive ruling
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor_Saints_Peter_and_Paul_Home_v._Pennsylvania
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Religious exemptions in healthcare
Clarified religious exemptions in healthcare |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2016
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|