|
gptkb:Maximum_Independent_Set
|
Given a graph G and integer k, does G have an independent set of size at least k?
|
|
gptkb:Cabinet_Government
|
by consensus
|
|
gptkb:Hansberry_v._Lee
|
Judgment reversed
|
|
gptkb:Constitutional_Court_of_Romania
|
constitutionality of Parliament regulations
|
|
gptkb:Guggenheim_Helsinki_Plan
|
gptkb:Helsinki_City_Council
|
|
gptkb:Guild_Council
|
gptkb:library
|
|
gptkb:Marbury_v._Madison
|
February 24, 1803
|
|
gptkb:Australian_Cabinet
|
collective responsibility
|
|
gptkb:Concilio_di_Trento
|
riforma della disciplina della comunione dei penitenti impenitenti
|
|
gptkb:Otis_McDonald,_et_al._v._City_of_Chicago,_Illinois,_et_al.
|
5-4
|
|
gptkb:High_Court_of_Justice_of_England_and_Wales
|
judicial reviews
|
|
gptkb:Bundesgericht
|
administrative law cases
|
|
gptkb:quarian_Admiralty_Board
|
fleet security
|
|
gptkb:Board_of_Zoning_Appeals
|
appeals of administrative decisions
|
|
gptkb:ESFJ
|
feeling over thinking
|
|
gptkb:Mammadov_v._Azerbaijan_(No._25)
|
judgment
|
|
gptkb:SPIE_Board_of_Directors
|
SPIE policies
|
|
gptkb:Bicameral_Congress
|
Both chambers must agree to pass legislation
|
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Ireland
|
constitutional matters
|
|
gptkb:Texas_v._Pennsylvania_(2020)
|
Texas lacked standing under Article III of the Constitution
|