Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
GPTKB entity
Properties (45)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
13-354
|
gptkbp:court |
Hobby Lobby's religious beliefs protected
Contraceptive_coverage_mandate_unconstitutional_for_Hobby_Lobby |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 2014 |
gptkbp:firstClaim |
Legal precedent for future cases
Impact on healthcare policy debates Discussion on corporate personhood Increased scrutiny on employer health plans Influence on state-level religious freedom laws Increased awareness of religious rights in business Legal_challenges_to_ACA_provisions |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
|
gptkbp:impact |
Corporate personhood
|
gptkbp:involves |
Affordable Care Act
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:First_Amendment
Constitutional law Religious Freedom Restoration Act Health care law Impact on employer-sponsored health plans Recognition of corporate religious rights Religious rights Influence on future cases regarding religious freedom Exemption_from_ACA's_contraceptive_mandate |
gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Title_VII_of_the_Civil_Rights_Act
Affordable Care Act Religious Freedom Restoration Act Employee Retirement Income Security Act |
gptkbp:outcome |
Hobby Lobby exempt from contraceptive mandate
|
gptkbp:party |
gptkb:Sylvia_Burwell
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
gptkbp:precedent |
Religious exemptions in healthcare
|
gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial decision
Debate on women's health rights Criticism from women's rights groups Support from religious organizations |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Zubik_v._Burwell
gptkb:Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor_Saints_Peter_and_Paul_Home_v._Pennsylvania |
gptkbp:significance |
First case to address religious objections to the ACA
|
gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|