Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Parents_Involved_in_Community_Schools_v._Seattle_School_District_No._1
GPTKB entity
Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:affects |
Affirmative action policies
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed in law schools and legal studies
Frequently discussed in legal forums Criticized by civil rights advocates Implications for school districts nationwide Relevant to discussions on race and education |
| gptkbp:case_educational_impact |
Impact on educational policy discussions
|
| gptkbp:case_future_implications |
Future implications for educational equity debates
|
| gptkbp:case_legislation_influence |
Influenced state-level education legislation
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Documented in legal databases
Case about race and school admissions policies |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Majority opinion emphasized individual rights Impact on school diversity initiatives Significant impact on educational equity |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Landmark case in education law
Historical significance in civil rights law |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Constitution
Supported by conservative groups |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 28, 2007 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg Dissent argued for the importance of diversity |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-Brown v. Board of Education era
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future Supreme Court cases
Educational policies regarding race |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Seattle_School_District_No._1
Parents Involved in Community Schools |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
551 U. S. 701 (2007)
|
| gptkbp:is_standardized_by |
Strict scrutiny
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Judicial review of school district policies
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Conservative judicial philosophy
Judicial impact on school district policies Part of the legal framework for education law |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
School desegregation
Arguments for and against race-based assignments Central to legal debates on race and education |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Invalidated certain school district practices
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Every_Student_Succeeds_Act
gptkb:No_Child_Left_Behind_Act |
| gptkbp:material |
Originated from Seattle, Washington
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down race-based school assignment plans
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent school assignment policies
Set a precedent for future cases regarding race in education |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:publications |
Published in law journals
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Grutter_v._Bollinger
gptkb:Brown_v._Board_of_Education |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Extensive legal analysis and commentary
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Affirmed the importance of individual rights over group identity in education
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:NAACP
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|