|
gptkb:legislation
|
ensures EU funds are used properly
|
|
gptkb:Argentine_Supreme_Court
|
notable
|
|
gptkb:U._S._v._Nixon
|
judicial review of executive actions
|
|
gptkb:Constitutional_Court_of_Lithuania
|
Government regulations
|
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Ramos
|
strengthens defendants' rights.
|
|
gptkb:AT&_T_Corp._v._Iowa_Utilities_Board
|
Chevron deference
|
|
gptkb:Judiciary_of_Barbados
|
Judicial review cases
|
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Reading_Co.
|
dissenting opinion by Justice Jackson
|
|
gptkb:Johansson_vs_Patterson_II
|
requested
|
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Ohio
|
state laws
|
|
gptkb:Town_of_Greece_v._Galloway
|
Reviewed by the Supreme Court.
|
|
gptkb:Trial_of_the_Conspirators
|
August 1865
|
|
gptkb:New_York_v._Quarles
|
on police interrogation rights
|
|
gptkb:Cherokee_Nation_v._Georgia
|
Judicial review of state laws affecting Native Americans
|
|
gptkb:R_(on_the_application_of_F)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
|
illegality
|
|
gptkb:Van_Orden_v._Perry
|
Reviewed by the Supreme Court.
|
|
gptkb:The_trial_of_the_Birmingham_Six
|
subsequent legal discussions
|
|
gptkb:Bowsher_v._Synar
|
Significance of legal critiques.
|
|
gptkb:Pennsylvania_Supreme_Court
|
of local ordinances
|
|
gptkb:State_v._Rangel
|
appeal process
|