Statements (112)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
April 1, 2003
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
02-241
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
5-4 decision |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2003
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court June 23, 2003 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas Judicial activism concerns Concerns about the implications for future cases Critique of the majority's reasoning Critique of the majority's reliance on social science data Concerns about the impact on non-minority applicants Affirmative action is discriminatory Calls for a more rigorous standard of review Calls for a return to strict scrutiny standards Calls for accountability in university policies Calls for legislative action instead of judicial Calls for transparency in admissions processes Concerns about the erosion of meritocracy Concerns about the future of affirmative action Constitutional colorblindness principle Contradicts the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Criticism of the educational benefits argument Critique of the concept of diversity as a goal Emphasis on equal treatment under the law Emphasis on the importance of individual rights Encourages racial division Long-term effects on society are negative Merit-based admissions are preferable Perpetuates racial stereotypes Racial preferences harm minority students Undermines the principle of individual merit Calls for a focus on socioeconomic status instead of race Concerns about the potential for reverse discrimination Calls for a reevaluation of affirmative action policies Concerns about the long-term viability of affirmative action Critique of the majority's interpretation of diversity benefits Critique of the concept of 'critical mass' in admissions |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
02-241
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 23, 2003
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
Affirmative action policies in the U. S. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Grutter v. Bollinger
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced affirmative action policies
Influenced college admissions policies |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:University_of_Michigan_Law_School
gptkb:Barbara_Grutter |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
539 U. S. 306
539 U. S. 306 (2003) |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
affirmative action
Affirmative action in higher education admissions |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Affirmative action upheld
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Equal_protection_clause
Diversity in education Affirmative action |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld affirmative action policies
Upheld the use of race in admissions Upheld the use of affirmative action |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Fisher_v._University_of_Texas
Affirmative action policies in universities Affirmative action policies in education |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Schuette_v._Coalition_to_Defend_Affirmative_Action
gptkb:Bakke_v._Regents_of_the_University_of_California gptkb:Gratz_v._Bollinger gptkb:Bakke_v._University_of_California gptkb:Regents_of_the_University_of_California_v._Bakke gptkb:Students_for_Fair_Admissions_v._Harvard_University gptkb:Fisher_v._University_of_Texas_at_Austin |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Analysis of dissenting opinions
Comparative analysis with other countries Judicial philosophy of the justices Public policy implications Role of advocacy groups Critiques of the decision Support for the decision Public opinion on affirmative action Impact on public universities Impact on minority students Impact on private universities Future legal challenges to affirmative action Legal implications for universities Analysis of majority opinions Comparative studies on diversity policies Debate on meritocracy Debate on race in admissions Ethical considerations of affirmative action Future of affirmative action in the U. S. Impact on law school admissions Impact on racial dynamics in education Legal precedents influencing the case Long-term effects on higher education Longitudinal studies on educational outcomes Media coverage of the case Role of the Supreme Court in education policy Social justice considerations |
| gptkbp:signed_by |
Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Landmark case in education law
Constitutional interpretation of equal protection |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'_Connor
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|