gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:category
|
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court
2003 in United States case law
United States affirmative action case law
|
gptkbp:citation
|
539 U.S. 306
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:date
|
2003-06-23
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Lee_Bollinger
gptkb:University_of_Michigan_Law_School
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
Anthony Kennedy (in part)
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
02-241
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Barbara_Grutter_v._Lee_Bollinger,_et_al.
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Grutter v. Bollinger
|
gptkbp:impact
|
upheld affirmative action in higher education admissions
|
gptkbp:legalSystem
|
gptkb:U.S._Constitution,_Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
Anthony Kennedy (in part)
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Students_for_Fair_Admissions_v._Harvard_(2023)
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Barbara_Grutter
|
gptkbp:principle
|
compelling state interest
narrow tailoring
strict scrutiny
|
gptkbp:priorAction
|
gptkb:Grutter_v._Bollinger,_288_F.3d_732_(6th_Cir._2002)
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Gratz_v._Bollinger
|
gptkbp:subject
|
affirmative action
equal protection
higher education admissions
|
gptkbp:subsequentHistory
|
Overruled in part by Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023)
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|