Barbara Grutter v. Lee Bollinger, et al.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Grutter_v._Bollinger
gptkbp:arguedDate	April 1, 2003
gptkbp:citation	539 U.S. 306
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date	June 23, 2003
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Lee_Bollinger gptkb:University_of_Michigan_Law_School
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:William_Rehnquist gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:docketNumber	02-241
gptkbp:heldBy	The University of Michigan Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions is constitutional.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Barbara Grutter v. Lee Bollinger, et al.
gptkbp:legalIssue	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment affirmative action equal protection
gptkbp:location	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:Barbara_Grutter
gptkbp:predecessor	affirmative action cases in higher education
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Gratz_v._Bollinger
gptkbp:subject	university admissions race-conscious admissions policies
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Grutter_v._Bollinger
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5