gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
5-4 ruling
June 30, 2014
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Burwell case
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:Health_Insurance
religious freedom
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Sylvia_Burwell
gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
573 U. S. 682 (2014)
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
contraceptive mandate
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
exemption for closely held corporations
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
controversial
debate on women's rights
debate on religious rights
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius
gptkb:Zubik_v._Burwell
gptkb:Little_Sisters_of_the_Poor_Saints_Peter_and_Paul_Home_v._Pennsylvania
gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis
|
impact on healthcare access
impact on public health
impact on civil rights
impact on women's health services
impact on future litigation
impact on religious liberty
impact on public policy
impact on constitutional law
impact on reproductive rights
impact on state laws
impact on corporate law
impact on business practices
impact on religious organizations
impact on federalism
impact on social justice
impact on federal regulations
impact on employee benefits
impact on Supreme Court jurisprudence
impact on contraceptive coverage
impact on employer-sponsored insurance
impact on health insurance policies
impact on legal interpretations of the ACA
impact on legislative intent
|
gptkbp:significance
|
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
First Amendment rights
Corporate personhood
|