National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius

GPTKB entity

AI-created image

Statements (38)

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:NFIB_v._Sebelius
gptkbp:arguedDate	March 26–28, 2012
gptkbp:category	2012 in United States case law United States health case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
gptkbp:citation	567 U.S. 519
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date	June 28, 2012
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Kathleen_Sebelius
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber	11-393
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_et_al._v._Sebelius,_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy	The individual mandate is constitutional as a tax. The Medicaid expansion provision is unconstitutional as written, but constitutional if states are given a choice.
gptkbp:impact	Upheld most provisions of the Affordable Care Act Limited federal power to coerce states with Medicaid funding
gptkbp:leader	gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:legalIssue	Is the Medicaid expansion provision constitutional? Is the individual mandate constitutional under the Commerce Clause or Taxing and Spending Clause?
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:plaintiff	gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business
gptkbp:predecessor	gptkb:King_v._Burwell
gptkbp:relatedLegislation	gptkb:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act Individual mandate Medicaid expansion
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:bfsLayer	4
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius