National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius

GPTKB entity
AI-created image of National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
AI-created image

Statements (38)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs gptkb:NFIB_v._Sebelius
gptkbp:arguedDate March 26–28, 2012
gptkbp:category 2012 in United States case law
United States health case law
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
gptkbp:citation 567 U.S. 519
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:date June 28, 2012
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:defendant gptkb:Kathleen_Sebelius
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:docketNumber 11-393
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_et_al._v._Sebelius,_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services,_et_al.
gptkbp:heldBy The individual mandate is constitutional as a tax.
The Medicaid expansion provision is unconstitutional as written, but constitutional if states are given a choice.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
gptkbp:impact Upheld most provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Limited federal power to coerce states with Medicaid funding
gptkbp:leader gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:legalIssue Is the Medicaid expansion provision constitutional?
Is the individual mandate constitutional under the Commerce Clause or Taxing and Spending Clause?
gptkbp:location gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:plaintiff gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business
gptkbp:predecessor gptkb:King_v._Burwell
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act
gptkbp:subject gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
Individual mandate
Medicaid expansion
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkbp:bfsLayer 4