National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
GPTKB entity
Statements (150)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
States' rights
Commerce Clause Taxing power |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Law schools
Legal scholars |
| gptkbp:case_number |
11-393
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Public health policy
5-4 ruling Mixed ruling |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Landmark decision
Health care reform history |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:sports_team
gptkb:Washington,_D._C. gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States Sebelius |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court June 28, 2012 |
| gptkbp:dissent_impact |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia gptkb:4 gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Insurance_Company gptkb:local_government gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Public_health gptkb:Public_opinion gptkb:Separation_of_powers Federal funding State funding Constitutional interpretation Social policy Consumer choice Economic implications Legal arguments Legal challenges Individual rights Legal precedent Judicial decisions Healthcare costs Political implications Commerce Clause State sovereignty Constitutional debates Government overreach Economic freedom Judicial activism Constitutional limits Judicial restraint State rights Legislative intent Public policy implications Individual mandate constitutionality Critique of federal authority Federalism concerns Taxing power Justice Alito's dissent Justice Kennedy's dissent Justice Scalia's dissent Justice Thomas's dissent Justices Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Kennedy State mandates Overreach of federal power Liberty interests Constitutional debate Strict interpretation Unconstitutional under Commerce Clause Unconstitutionality of the mandate |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 28, 2012
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
gptkb:Insurance_Company
Federalism Medicaid expansion |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:2008_Presidential_election
Health care reform debates 2009 Affordable Care Act passage |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:healthcare_reform
States' rights Health care policy Public health initiatives Political landscape Insurance premiums Health insurance market Health care costs Access to health care services Individual mandate Consumer protections in health care Health insurance marketplaces Legal challenges to health care laws Public opinion on health care Insurance coverage expansion Health care policy changes Employer mandate discussions Federal vs. state authority in health care Judicial interpretation of commerce power Legal standards for health care Medicaid funding debates State-level health care initiatives |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:sports_team
Sebelius |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Health care law
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:key_issues |
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Health care policy
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Upholding ACA provisions
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
Medicaid expansion |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Partial invalidation of Medicaid expansion
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Commerce Clause
Taxing Power |
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_critique |
Judicial activism
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_effect |
Legitimacy of ACA
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_implication |
Federal tax authority
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_legacy |
Legal precedent
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_rationale |
Tax is constitutional
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_support |
Constitutional interpretation
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The individual mandate was upheld as a tax
Partially upheld Partially struck down Upheld individual mandate as a tax |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Constitution
Subsequent health care legislation Future health care legislation Federal health care regulation |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts 5-4 Political landscape Individual mandate Justice Breyer's concurrence Justice Ginsburg's concurrence Justice Kagan's concurrence Justice Sotomayor's concurrence Constitutional under taxing power Taxation justification |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
gptkb:Mixed
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:King_v._Burwell
gptkb:California_v._Texas gptkb:NFIB_v._Sebelius gptkb:Florida_v._HHS |
| gptkbp:significance |
Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|