Statements (19)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
495 U.S. 508
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1990-05-29
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist |
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
89-474
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
The Double Jeopardy Clause bars a subsequent prosecution if, to establish an essential element of an offense charged in that prosecution, the government will prove conduct that constitutes an offense for which the defendant has already been prosecuted.
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
Double jeopardy
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
gptkb:United_States_v._Dixon
1993 |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Blockburger_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Grady v. Corbin
|