|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
October 30, 1989
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
legal scholars
influenced legal standards
defendant rights
reinstated original charges
|
|
gptkbp:case_impact_on_law
|
shaped double jeopardy interpretations
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_appeals
|
influences appellate court decisions
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_civil_rights
|
important for civil liberties advocacy
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_constitutional_law
|
affects constitutional interpretations
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_defendants
|
protection against double jeopardy
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_judicial_system
|
affects trial processes
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_law_enforcement
|
affects prosecution strategies
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_education
|
important for law students
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_precedents
|
important for future rulings
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_reforms
|
influences reform movements
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_legal_rights
|
strengthened defendant protections
|
|
gptkbp:case_implications_for_public_policy
|
affects criminal justice policies
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
involved multiple charges
important legal precedent
88-577
involved retrial
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
precedent for future cases
influenced legal strategies
reinstated charges
expanded double jeopardy protections
|
|
gptkbp:case_relevance_to_law
|
important for legal practitioners
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
influenced future rulings
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:1990
gptkb:Justice_Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
88-577
|
|
gptkbp:doctrine
|
collateral estoppel
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
March 27, 1990
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Grady v. Corbin
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
interpretation of the Double Jeopardy Clause
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Grady and Corbin
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
498 U. S. 416
88-577
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
multiple prosecutions
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
Supreme Court review
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
fifth amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
constitutional law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
gptkb:double_jeopardy
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
same elements test
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
public defender
impact on state prosecutions
|
|
gptkbp:material
|
involved serious criminal offenses
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed conviction
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Blockburger_v._United_States
subsequent double jeopardy cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Corbin_v._Grady
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
clarified double jeopardy protections
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Mc_Laughlin_v._Florida
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|