|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1927-03-01
1926-10-27
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
1927 in United States case law
United States Free Speech Clause case law
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
274 U.S. 357
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1927-05-16
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Charlotte_Anita_Whitney_v._People_of_the_State_of_California
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's Criminal Syndicalism Act did not violate the First Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Whitney v. California
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
freedom of speech
criminal syndicalism
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Edward_Terry_Sanford
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Charlotte_Anita_Whitney
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Gitlow_v._New_York
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_California
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:military
freedom of association
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|