Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Criticized for its limitations on free speech
Evaluated for its implications on civil liberties Examined implications for free speech |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_Edward_T._Sanford
Majority ruled against Whitney Set standards for future free speech cases Upholding of California's law |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
First major case on free speech
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Influenced future free speech cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 7, 1927 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Holmes
gptkb:Justice_Brandeis Justices who opposed the ruling Advocated for broader free speech protections |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-World War I America
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Influenced First Amendment interpretations
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Whitney v. California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced civil rights movements
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_California
Charlotte Whitney |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Cited in legal arguments
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices who supported the ruling
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court's role in free speech cases
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Continues to be referenced in legal discussions.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Political climate of the 1920s
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
First Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
Ongoing discussions about free speech limits Advocated for political speech protections |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Constitutional interpretation
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
First Amendment protections
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined state interests vs. individual rights
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Clear and present danger doctrine
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Clear and present danger test
Established limits on free speech Influenced judicial decisions |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
Upholds state law against criminal syndicalism
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
gptkb:Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District gptkb:Gitlow_v._New_York gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Analyzed in legal studies
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Free speech jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio gptkb:Espionage_Act_of_1917 |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|