Statements (23)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
247 U.S. 251
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
1918-06-03
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Hammer,_United_States_Attorney_v._Dagenhart_et_al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Congress does not have the power under the Commerce Clause to regulate labor conditions
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Hammer v. Dagenhart
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
Commerce Clause
Child labor regulation |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:William_R._Day
|
| gptkbp:overruledBy |
gptkb:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co.
1941 |
| gptkbp:overruledByCaseCitation |
gptkb:312_U.S._100
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
child labor law cases
|
| gptkbp:requires |
1918-04-15
|
| gptkbp:struck |
gptkb:Keating-Owen_Child_Labor_Act_of_1916
|
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:Federalism
Child labor Commerce power |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|