Properties (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
06-1195
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
subsequent cases regarding detainee rights
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
National security concerns
Civil liberties debates U.S._foreign_policy |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
5-4 ruling |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 12, 2008 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
December 5, 2007
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Critics viewed it as judicial overreach
Legal scholars debated its impact Supporters hailed it as a victory for justice |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Post-9/11 legal landscape
|
| gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
Set a precedent for detainee rights
Influenced_future_Supreme_Court_decisions Landmark_case_in_U.S._legal_history |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Boumediene v. Bush
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Legal_status_of_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay
|
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:George_W._Bush
gptkb:Lakhdar_Boumediene |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Dissent argued against judicial intervention Majority opinion emphasized due process Executive detention policies |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:Rasul_v._Bush
gptkb:U.S._Constitution gptkb:ACLU gptkb:Center_for_Constitutional_Rights Habeas corpus rights |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media attention
Debates on civil rights Analysis of executive power |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:National_Defense_Authorization_Act
Military Commissions Act of 2006 Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Guantanamo_Bay_detainees_have_the_right_to_challenge_their_detention
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Rights of non-citizens
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
gptkb:Zadvydas_v._Davis gptkb:Al_Maqaleh_v._Gates |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
War on Terror
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Expansion of habeas corpus rights
|