Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:broadcasting_rights |
Protected under the First Amendment
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Examined implications for free speech
Relevant to digital age laws |
| gptkbp:case_number |
16-402
Involved a registered sex offender Involved prior convictions Involved constitutional rights and social media access. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Unanimous decision
Majority opinion emphasized free speech Ruling favored individual rights Influenced future legislation on online conduct Invalidated law restricting online access Law deemed overly broad |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Landmark case for digital rights
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Review of sex offender laws
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 19, 2017 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
Dissent focused on public safety concerns Justices against Packingham |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 19, 2017
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Packingham
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:State_of_North_Carolina
gptkb:Lester_Packingham |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
582 U. S. 98
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices in favor of Packingham
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Sex offender registration laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:Constitution
Influence on state laws Reinforced free speech protections |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
First Amendment vs. public safety |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Struck down North Carolina law
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
First Amendment implications
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The law was struck down as unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set precedent for online speech rights
Social media restrictions for sex offenders |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Mixed reactions
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Doe_v._Snyder
gptkb:Packingham_v._North_Carolina Implications for future cases |
| gptkbp:significance |
Impact on free speech laws
|
| gptkbp:social_media |
gptkb:Twitter
gptkb:Instagram gptkb:Facebook |
| gptkbp:state_interest |
Protecting children from harm
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Packingham_v._North_Carolina
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|