Packingham v. North Carolina
GPTKB entity
Properties (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Reinforced free speech protections
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
15-1194
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
Infringement on free speech
State's_interest_in_protecting_children |
| gptkbp:court |
Balancing state interests with individual rights
Unconstitutional restriction on access to social media Justices_Breyer,_Ginsburg,_Kagan,_Sotomayor,_and_Roberts |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 19, 2017 |
| gptkbp:futurePlans |
Potential for future legal challenges
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Debates in legal scholarship
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Part of broader discussions on digital rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Packingham v. North Carolina
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state laws regarding online presence
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito Judicial activism Justice Clarence Thomas Judicial scrutiny of state laws Reaffirmed importance of free expression Reinforced First Amendment protections in digital age Justices_Alito,_Thomas,_and_Gorsuch |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analysis of free speech implications
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:North_Carolina_Attorney_General
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union gptkb:First_Amendment March 28, 2017 Sex offender registration laws Part of the legal framework for online conduct Set a legal precedent for online speech rights Set a precedent for future cases regarding online speech First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:North_Carolina_General_Statutes_§_14-202.5
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Used as a case study in law schools
Significant for civil liberties |
| gptkbp:outcome |
North_Carolina_law_struck_down
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
First_Amendment_protections_apply_to_social_media
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from advocacy groups
Impact on public policy regarding sex offenders |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Doe
Influenced cases on digital privacy |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:State_of_North_Carolina
|
| gptkbp:signatories |
gptkb:Lester_Packingham
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Impact on social media restrictions for sex offenders
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
6-3
|