|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1997-04-16
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:521_U.S._642
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1997-06-25
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
96-842
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:United_States_v._James_O'Hagan
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. O'Hagan
|
|
gptkbp:legalHolding
|
SEC Rule 14e-3 does not violate the Constitution.
The misappropriation theory is a valid basis for insider trading liability under §10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Securities_Exchange_Act_of_1934
gptkb:SEC_Rule_10b-5
gptkb:SEC_Rule_14e-3
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:James_O'Hagan
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
insider trading
misappropriation theory
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_securities_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|