United States v. Jones (2015)
GPTKB entity
Statements (54)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
November 8, 2011
|
gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed by legal scholars
|
gptkbp:case_number |
10-1259
Involved prior surveillance cases |
gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
Affirmed lower court's decision Reinforced need for warrants Set a standard for future cases Influenced public policy on surveillance Highlighted importance of consent Raised questions about technology and privacy Set a precedent for digital privacy rights Unanimous in privacy concern Reinforced judicial oversight of surveillance practices Influenced future Supreme Court decisions on privacy |
gptkbp:case_significance |
Landmark decision in privacy law
|
gptkbp:case_types |
Criminal law
|
gptkbp:consequences |
Strengthened privacy rights
Affected law enforcement practices |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Roberts_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 23, 2012 |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
Concern over technological advancements |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Jones (2015)
|
gptkbp:impact |
Influenced state laws on surveillance
|
gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:Antoine_Jones |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:Carpenter_v._United_States
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legal_context |
Evolving standards of privacy
|
gptkbp:legal_framework |
Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Government argued for minimal intrusion Jones argued for privacy rights |
gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Reinforced Fourth Amendment protections
|
gptkbp:legislation |
Search and seizure
|
gptkbp:outcome |
Warrantless GPS tracking unconstitutional
|
gptkbp:precedent |
GPS tracking requires a warrant
Established limits on government surveillance Subsequent cases on surveillance |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Emphasized physical intrusion |
gptkbp:public_reaction |
Debate on privacy vs. security
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:United_States_v._Carpenter
gptkb:United_States_v._Maynard |
gptkbp:related_to |
Privacy law
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Examined implications for law enforcement
Discussed impact on civil liberties |
gptkbp:significance |
Clarified expectations of privacy
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|