Properties (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Strengthened Fourth Amendment protections
Enhanced legal standards for wiretapping Established legal framework for privacy rights Increased scrutiny of law enforcement practices Limited government surveillance powers |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 67
Criminal law case |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
Numerous subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
December 18, 1967 |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Civil rights movement era
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Katz v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced privacy law
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
gptkb:Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act
Electronic Communications Privacy Act |
| gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Charles_Katz |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist Originalism Justice Harry Blackmun Living Constitution Judicial activism Judicial restraint Judicial scrutiny of surveillance practices |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Reversed and remanded
Reasonable expectation of privacy Wiretapping laws Privacy rights in the digital age Set precedent for privacy rights Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Expanded_interpretation_of_the_Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Overturned conviction
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:Justice_Abe_Fortas |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Warrantless wiretapping
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
gptkb:Carpenter_v._United_States gptkb:United_States_v._Jones gptkb:Olmstead_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Fourth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Established expectation of privacy standard
|