|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1967-10-17
1967-10-18
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
1967 in United States case law
Landmark United States Supreme Court case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
389 U.S. 347
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1967-12-18
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
35
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Warrantless wiretapping of a public phone booth violates the Fourth Amendment.
The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Katz v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Established the 'reasonable expectation of privacy' test
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Olmstead_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Charles_Katz
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Reasonable expectation of privacy
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Olmstead_v._United_States
gptkb:Carpenter_v._United_States
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
search and seizure
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|