Properties (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Constitutional law
Criminal law Privacy law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
138 S. Ct. 2206
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Fourth_Amendment_interpretation
|
| gptkbp:context |
Cell phone tracking
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 22, 2018 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 29, 2017
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Timothy_Carpenter |
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Impact on digital privacy law
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Lower court rulings
Implications for future cases Influence on state laws Privacy concerns raised Debate over digital privacy Evidence collection methods Legal arguments presented Legal precedents established Public interest in privacy rights Technological advancements in tracking Use of cell site location information Judicial_interpretations_of_the_Fourth_Amendment Timothy_Carpenter's_conviction Appeal_to_the_Supreme_Court Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation_involvement |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Carpenter v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Law_enforcement_practices
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Reasonable expectation of privacy
Reinforced warrant requirement Strengthens privacy protections Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Electronic Communications Privacy Act
Stored Communications Act |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Landmark decision
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Warrant required for cell phone location data
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Privacy in digital age
Requires warrants for historical cell site data |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed opinions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones |
| gptkbp:technology |
Mobile devices
Location tracking Cellular networks |
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|