Properties (51)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
gptkbp:audience |
privacy in the digital age
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
16-402
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
138 S. Ct. 2206
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
privacy advocates
|
gptkbp:consequences |
data privacy laws
|
gptkbp:controversy |
November 29, 2017
privacy vs. security cell site location information |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
Fourth Amendment warrantless access unconstitutional expanded privacy rights historical cell site data |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
June 22, 2018
|
gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Timothy_Carpenter |
gptkbp:homeGround |
Timothy_Carpenter's_conviction
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Carpenter
|
gptkbp:impact |
future privacy cases
law_enforcement_practices |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
technological advancements privacy concerns Supreme_Court_review |
gptkbp:keyPeople |
5-4 ruling
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
reasonable expectation of privacy
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:ACLU
scholarly articles constitutional law |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
digital privacy
digital data collection Fourth_Amendment_protections |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
data retention policies
landmark ruling impact on technology modern surveillance practices law enforcement access to data landmark_Supreme_Court_decision. |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed lower court ruling
significant legal precedent warrant required for cell phone location data |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_John_Roberts
|
gptkbp:precedent |
privacy rights in digital age
government surveillance limits Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Riley_v._California
gptkb:United_States_v._Jones impact on future rulings |
gptkbp:research |
cell phone records
|