Shapiro v. Thompson, 393 U.S. 97 (1969)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	1968-10-23 1969-01-22
gptkbp:category	United States Supreme Court cases 1969 in United States case law
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:393_U.S._97
gptkbp:date	1969-04-21
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Hugo_Black gptkb:Potter_Stewart gptkb:John_M._Harlan_II
gptkbp:fullName	Vivian Marie Shapiro, et al. v. Samuel Thompson, Commissioner of Social Services of the District of Columbia, et al.
gptkbp:heldBy	State-imposed one-year residency requirements for welfare benefits violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Shapiro v. Thompson, 393 U.S. 97 (1969)
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:Byron_White gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall gptkb:William_O._Douglas gptkb:Abe_Fortas gptkb:Earl_Warren
gptkbp:location	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkbp:overruledBy	State residency requirements for welfare benefits
gptkbp:predecessor	gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe
gptkbp:principle	gptkb:Right_to_travel gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:constitutional_law Welfare benefits Residency requirements
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:393_U.S._97
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8