|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
January 13, 1999
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
526 U.S. 489
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
May 17, 1999
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
97-97
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Saenz,_Director,_California_Department_of_Social_Services_v._Roe_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's law limiting welfare benefits for new residents violated the right to travel under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Saenz v. Roe
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
right to travel
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Justice_William_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:California
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
right to travel jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
welfare benefits
residency requirements
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Shapiro_v._Thompson
gptkb:Privileges_and_Immunities_Clause
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|