R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul
GPTKB entity
Statements (105)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Texas_v._Johnson
gptkb:United_States_v._Stevens gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
First Amendment case 91-1 |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 22, 1992 |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 22, 1992
|
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
Free speech advocacy
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
December 9, 1991
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced public discourse on free speech
Influenced hate speech laws Influenced hate speech legislation Affected local ordinances Guided legal arguments in free speech cases Influenced Supreme Court's approach to free speech Shaped legal standards for hate speech |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
505 U. S. 377 (1992)
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
City of St. Paul (respondent)
R. A. V. (petitioner) |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
United States federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
Time, place, and manner restrictions Clear and present danger test Strict scrutiny standard Symbolic speech protection Marketplace of ideas Overbreadth doctrine Vagueness doctrine Incitement standard Public forum doctrine Prior restraint doctrine Public interest standard Political speech protection Fighting words doctrine Hate speech legislation Chilling effect doctrine Civil liberties standard Commercial speech protection Constitutional interpretation standard Constitutional rights standard Content neutrality Cultural significance standard Government interest standard Hate crime laws Historical context standard Individual rights standard Judicial review standard Judicial scrutiny standard Legal precedent standard Non-commercial speech protection Social value standard |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:political_movement
gptkb:First_Amendment_Protection_Act Anti-Discrimination Laws Symbolic speech Hate Speech Laws Incitement standard Viewpoint discrimination Content-based restrictions Fighting words doctrine State Hate Crime Laws |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Virginia_v._Black
gptkb:Matal_v._Tam gptkb:Texas_v._Johnson gptkb:Packingham_v._North_Carolina |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Unanimous decision
First Amendment implications Influence on academic discourse Impact on civil rights Influenced future legislation Balancing free speech and public order Constitutional protections for speech Future challenges to free speech protections Government's role in regulating speech Historical context of free speech debates Implications for local ordinances Invalidated local ordinance Judicial interpretations of the First Amendment Judicial scrutiny levels Legal definitions of hate speech Legal precedents in free speech law Legal ramifications for hate speech laws Long-term effects on free speech advocacy Public interest in free expression Public reaction to the decision Role of the Supreme Court in free speech cases Struck down a city ordinance The ordinance was struck down Struck down the city ordinance |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Free speech cases
Content-based restrictions on speech Content-neutral vs. content-based laws |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens Concern over hate speech Protection of all speech |
| gptkbp:significance |
First Amendment jurisprudence
Clarified limits of free speech protections Clarified limits of hate speech laws |