United States v. Stevens

GPTKB entity

Statements (49)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome Unconstitutional law
Animal cruelty legislation reform
Influenced public perception of animal rights
Reinforced protections against vague laws.
gptkbp:caseTypes Constitutional law
gptkbp:citedBy 559 U.S. 460
gptkbp:collectionFocus Broad interpretation of free speech
gptkbp:controversy Free speech vs. animal cruelty
gptkbp:court 5-4 ruling
Constitutional protection of speech
Free speech vs. societal interests
Justices_Roberts,_Scalia,_Thomas,_Kennedy
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 20, 2010
gptkbp:filedIn October 6, 2009
gptkbp:hasFocusOn Potential harm to animals
gptkbp:historicalEvent Challenged federal law
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label United States v. Stevens
gptkbp:impact Struck down 18 U.S.C. § 48
gptkbp:judges Justice Stephen Breyer
Set precedent for future free speech cases
Majority opinion emphasized free speech
Need for regulation of animal cruelty
Reaffirmation of free speech rights
Supreme_Court_review
Justices_Ginsburg,_Breyer,_Sotomayor,_Kagan
Significant_First_Amendment_ruling
gptkbp:legal_representation First_Amendment_implications
gptkbp:legalStatus Impact on animal cruelty laws
Balancing free speech and animal rights
Invalidated federal statute
Striking down vague laws
First_Amendment_rights
First_Amendment_protections
First_Amendment_law
gptkbp:notableFeature Influence on future cases
Debate on free speech limits
Continues to be cited in legal discussions
Involved depictions of animal cruelty
Cited_in_future_First_Amendment_cases
Example_of_First_Amendment_challenges
gptkbp:outcome The law was struck down as unconstitutional
gptkbp:politicalAffiliation gptkb:Robert_J._Stevens
gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
gptkbp:precedent Content-based restrictions on speech
First_Amendment_jurisprudence
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:United_States_v._Williams