gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
October 6, 2009
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
08-769
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
Unconstitutional under the First Amendment
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Free speech case
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
Limits on government regulation of speech
Legal standards for obscenity
Impact on future legislation
Broad interpretation of free speech
Protection of artistic expression
Balancing free speech and societal interests
Challenges to obscenity laws
Judicial review of content-based laws
Judicial scrutiny of speech restrictions
First Amendment protections for controversial speech
|
gptkbp:date
|
November 2, 2009
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 20, 2010
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
April 20, 2010
|
gptkbp:election
|
8-1
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
Post-9/11 free speech issues
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
United States v. Stevens
|
gptkbp:impact
|
First Amendment jurisprudence
Legislation on animal cruelty
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
559 U. S. 460
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
Federal law on animal cruelty
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
First Amendment rights
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Statute struck down
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Virginia_v._Black
gptkb:Texas_v._Johnson
gptkb:R._A._V._v._City_of_St._Paul
gptkb:United_States_v._O'_Brien
Content-based restrictions on speech
|
gptkbp:propulsion
|
gptkb:Robert_J._Stevens
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
Debate on free speech
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Alvarez
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
animal cruelty videos
|
gptkbp:responds_to
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:scholarly_analysis
|
First Amendment implications
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Protection of expressive conduct
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
3
|