Statements (147)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:chief_justice_role |
Encourages compromise among justices
Influences judicial philosophy Mediator in divided court Promotes judicial restraint |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Affects Supreme Court's approach to economic regulation
Influences future health care legislation Sets precedent for federalism issues |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 28, 2012 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Scalia gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas separation of powers economic freedom states' rights government overreach judicial activism public trust in the judiciary individual liberty constitutional interpretation judicial restraint federal funding conditions impact on civil liberties judicial philosophy impact on future legislation role of the judiciary impact on low-income individuals burden on small businesses impact on state budgets economic implications of the ruling constitutionality of the mandate limits of federal power effect on political discourse interpretation of the Constitution effect on federal-state relations effect on healthcare access effect on insurance markets federal coercion of states impact on future Supreme Court cases interpretation of federal powers interpretation of the Commerce Clause interpretation of the Taxing Power long-term consequences for healthcare political implications of the ruling public opinion on healthcare reform role of states in healthcare role of the Supreme Court in democracy balance of power between state and federal government |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 28, 2012
|
| gptkbp:election |
5-4
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
Medicaid expansion
State sovereignty Individual mandate |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-2008 financial crisis
Political polarization in the U. S. Rise of health care costs |
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Landmark case
Federal power expansion Health care law precedent State rights debate |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
NFIB v. Sebelius
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:Health_Insurance
gptkb:healthcare_reform gptkb:federal_government Affordable Care Act implementation |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:sports_team
Sebelius |
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
Constitutional interpretation
Health care policy Role of federal government |
| gptkbp:judges |
Limits Congress's power under the Commerce Clause
States cannot be forced to expand Medicaid Upholds individual mandate as a tax |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Samuel_Alito gptkb:Clarence_Thomas Constitutionality of federal laws |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Taxation
Federalism Health care policy Insurance mandate |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act
Medicaid expansion |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Insurance market reforms
Constitutional limits on federal authority Debate over individual rights State vs. federal jurisdiction Tax penalties for non-compliance Debate over economic impact of health care laws Debate over federalism in health care Debate over government mandates Debate over health care access Debate over insurance coverage requirements Debate over taxation authority Impact on future health care legislation Influence on subsequent Supreme Court cases Judicial interpretation of the ACA Medicaid expansion issues Political ramifications for the ACA Public opinion on health care reform State challenges to federal mandates |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Constitution gptkb:Separation_of_powers Public policy Administrative law Federalism Interstate commerce Taxation authority |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:American_Health_Care_Act
gptkb:Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
Extensive coverage
Polarizing opinions |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld individual mandate
Individual mandate upheld as a tax Constitutional and unconstitutional provisions struck down Medicaid expansion provision |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Commerce Clause interpretation
Commerce Clause future healthcare legislation Taxing Power |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Roberts
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts gptkb:John_Roberts |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial decision
Controversial ruling |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkb:King_v._Burwell gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius gptkb:California_v._Texas |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Economic implications
Legal implications Political implications Social implications |
| gptkbp:significance |
gptkb:Constitution
gptkb:healthcare_reform |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|