Properties (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
19-840
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Public health policy
Political landscape Insurance markets State vs. federal authority Future healthcare reforms |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 17, 2021 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
November 10, 2020
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Debated in academic circles
Impact on administrative law Examined in legal journals Impact on public policy Impact on constitutional law |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Reflects political divide on healthcare
Influenced_by_previous_Supreme_Court_rulings Part_of_ongoing_ACA_litigation |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
California v. Texas
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Health insurance coverage
Medicaid expansion Pre-existing conditions |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Amy_Coney_Barrett gptkb:Brett_Kavanaugh Clarence Thomas |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Affordable Care Act
Impact on healthcare policy No standing to sue Taxpayer standing States'_rights ACA_remains_intact Severability_of_ACA_provisions |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The_court_upheld_the_ACA
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
State of California
State of Texas Other states |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice Stephen Breyer
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Influences future healthcare legislation
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed opinions
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:King_v._Burwell
gptkb:National_Federation_of_Independent_Business_v._Sebelius |
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
7-2
|
| gptkbp:year |
2020
|