Properties (47)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
limited women's work hours to 10 per day
shaped future labor rights legislation upheld protective labor laws for women |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
constitutional law
No. 797 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
208 U.S. 412
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
7-2 ruling |
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1908 |
gptkbp:field |
labor law
|
gptkbp:historical_analysis |
examined in the context of women's rights
|
gptkbp:historicalContext |
Progressive Era reforms
|
gptkbp:historicalSignificance |
shift in labor law interpretation
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Muller v. Oregon
|
gptkbp:impact |
women's rights movement
|
gptkbp:influencedBy |
Brandeis Brief
|
gptkbp:involves |
women's labor laws
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Holmes
recognized state's role in labor regulation state regulations on working hours influenced_future_Supreme_Court_decisions |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
analyzed for its implications
early 20th century labor issues established standards for labor laws focused on health and welfare of women gender discrimination in labor laws influenced labor legislation police powers of the state protective legislation for women set precedent for gender-specific labor laws state's interest in protecting women's health upheld state regulation of business |
gptkbp:notableEvent |
Oregon's_10-hour_law
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
used in legal education
landmark decision in labor law still cited in labor law discussions examined in law schools |
gptkbp:outcome |
upheld state law limiting women's working hours
|
gptkbp:party |
Muller_and_the_State_of_Oregon
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Brewer
|
gptkbp:precedent |
future labor law cases
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Lochner_v._New_York
gptkb:Adkins_v._Children's_Hospital |
gptkbp:significance |
first case to use sociological data in legal arguments
|