Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
No. 70-4 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
404 U.S. 71
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 23, 1970
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
based on constitutional principles |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1971
January 15, 1971 |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
strict scrutiny
|
| gptkbp:gender |
addressed
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
frequently cited in gender law discussions
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
women's rights movement
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
remains relevant today
important_case_in_U.S._legal_history |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Reed v. Reed
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future gender discrimination cases
gender equality laws significant_in_U.S._history expanded_interpretation_of_the_Equal_Protection_Clause |
| gptkbp:internationalRelations |
gptkb:Idaho
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Sally_Reed
Cecil_Reed |
| gptkbp:issueFeePaid |
inheritance rights
|
| gptkbp:judges |
none
applied |
| gptkbp:lawEnforcement |
Idaho_statute_favoring_men
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Equal Protection Clause
probate_law |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
available in legal archives
widely studied in law schools influenced state laws often summarized in legal texts continues to influence legal thought paved the way for future rulings |
| gptkbp:outcome |
landmark ruling
ruled unconstitutional affirmed women's rights changed probate laws |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gender equality in law
established for future cases gender discrimination cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
raised awareness of gender issues
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Craig_v._Boren
Frontiero v. Richardson |
| gptkbp:significance |
first case to declare a law unconstitutional based on gender discrimination
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
7-0
|