Properties (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced public perception of privacy
legal precedent for future cases shaped future legal standards legal justification for wiretapping privacy rights debate upheld convictions based on wiretaps upheld legality of wiretaps |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
affirmed lower court ruling
government's right to surveil |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
1928 |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Prohibition era
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from lower court
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
involved bootlegging operations
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Olmstead v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
privacy law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis
constitutional interpretation majority opinion favored government upheld federal wiretap laws influenced_Fourth_Amendment_interpretations Justice_Brandeis'_view_on_privacy |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
government surveillance
conviction upheld wiretapping early 20th century law expectation of privacy no physical intrusion upheld wiretap evidence Fourth_Amendment_protections |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
debate on privacy vs. security
influenced future privacy cases 277 U.S. 438 landmark decision in privacy law involved organized crime modern surveillance issues |
| gptkbp:outcome |
upheld the use of wiretaps
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Roy_Olmstead
gptkb:United_States_government |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Taft
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
law enforcement wiretapping
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
affects law enforcement practices |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Fourth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:research |
wiretap evidence
|
| gptkbp:significance |
set precedent for privacy rights
|