Fisher v. University of Texas

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Fisher_I
gptkbp:arguedDate	October 10, 2012
gptkbp:citation	570 U.S. 297 (2013)
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkbp:date	June 24, 2013
gptkbp:decision	vacated and remanded
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkbp:docketNumber	11-345
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Abigail_Noel_Fisher_v._University_of_Texas_at_Austin
gptkbp:heldBy	The Fifth Circuit's decision was vacated and remanded
gptkbp:joinedBy	gptkb:John_Roberts gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Clarence_Thomas gptkb:Elena_Kagan gptkb:Samuel_Alito gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:location	gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkbp:numberOfIssues	constitutionality of affirmative action in university admissions
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Abigail_Noel_Fisher
gptkbp:precedentSet	strict scrutiny must be applied to race-conscious admissions policies
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Regents_of_the_University_of_California_v._Bakke gptkb:Fisher_v._University_of_Texas_II gptkb:Grutter_v._Bollinger
gptkbp:response	gptkb:University_of_Texas_at_Austin
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause affirmative action
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Equal_Protection_Clause
gptkbp:bfsLayer	5
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Fisher v. University of Texas