Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
GPTKB entity
Statements (186)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
Increased activism
Impact on women's rights movements Changes in public health policy Legal challenges in various states Influence on political campaigns Potential for future legal challenges Increased scrutiny of state laws State referendums on abortion rights Increased funding for abortion access organizations Changes in medical practice regarding abortion Changes in state abortion laws Impact on healthcare access for women Impact on reproductive health policies Impact on women's health care Increased polarization on abortion issues Influence on future Supreme Court cases Legal implications for healthcare providers Legal ramifications for abortion providers Public discourse on reproductive rights Shift in public opinion on abortion Potential for federal legislation on abortion rights Potential for Supreme Court revisiting abortion laws State legislatures introduced new abortion laws |
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:Constitution
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
Constitutional interpretation of abortion rights
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
19-1392
|
| gptkbp:civic_engagement |
Debate on civil rights implications
|
| gptkbp:community_impact |
Revitalization of community organizing efforts
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Increased state-level abortion restrictions
State sovereignty in health laws |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court June 24, 2022 |
| gptkbp:discussions_in_media |
Extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer International human rights standards Constitutional right to privacy Public health implications Role of women in society Role of the judiciary Impact on women's health Potential for future legal challenges Access to reproductive healthcare Impact on healthcare providers Historical context of abortion laws Judicial activism concerns Legal implications for future cases Cultural implications of the ruling Impact on marginalized communities Constitutional interpretation methods Women’s autonomy Legal ramifications for states Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan Potential for increased litigation Future of reproductive rights in the U. S. Judicial restraint principles Role of the Supreme Court in social issues Ethical implications of the ruling Gender equality concerns Historical treatment of women’s rights Judicial precedent and its importance Legal consistency and coherence Legal reasoning of the majority opinion Legal stability and reliance interests Legislative intent of abortion laws Long-term consequences for women’s rights Moral considerations in abortion debates Potential for increased unsafe abortions Precedent of Roe and Casey Public discourse on abortion Public opinion on abortion rights Role of states in regulating abortion Societal implications of restricting abortion |
| gptkbp:educational_value |
Increased focus on reproductive education
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_family_planning |
Changes in family planning services
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_future_cases |
Potential challenges to other rights
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_healthcare_legislation |
Changes in healthcare legislation proposals
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_healthcare_policy |
Changes in healthcare access
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_healthcare_providers |
Changes in medical practices
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_legal_education |
Increased focus on constitutional law courses
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_low-income_women |
Disproportionate impact
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_public_opinion |
Polarized views on abortion
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_public_policy |
Changes in public policy debates
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_state_laws |
Varied state responses
|
| gptkbp:effect_on_women's_rights |
Debate on women's rights
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 24, 2022
|
| gptkbp:future_prospects |
Legal challenges to state laws
Impact on women's health care Political ramifications for elections Potential changes to abortion laws Potential for further legal battles |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Women's_rights_movement
Part of ongoing abortion debate Legal history of abortion in the U. S. Supreme Court's role in social issues |
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Landmark decision
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State abortion laws
Increased state-level abortion restrictions State laws on abortion |
| gptkbp:impact_on_abortion_clinics |
Closure of clinics in some states
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_healthcare_access |
Access disparities
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_healthcare_providers |
Increased legal risks
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_legal_discourse |
Shifts in legal discourse on rights.
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_minors |
Access to abortion for minors
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_reproductive_health |
Changes in reproductive health services
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_social_justice |
Debate on social justice issues
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_social_movements |
Revitalization of women's rights movements
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_women's_health |
Access to abortion services
|
| gptkbp:impact_on_youth_activism |
Increased youth activism on reproductive rights
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Judicial appointments
Religious beliefs Public opinion polls Political climate |
| gptkbp:international_response |
Global discussions on reproductive rights
|
| gptkbp:involved |
Mississippi law on abortion
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
gptkb:State_of_Mississippi |
| gptkbp:is_a_supporter_of |
Increased activism for reproductive rights
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Subsequent legal challenges
597 U. S. ___ (2022) |
| gptkbp:is_countered_by |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey |
| gptkbp:is_significant_for |
abortion legality
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Constitution
Abortion laws in the United States State vs. federal authority Abortion law in the United States |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Constitutional interpretation
Originalism Conservative jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Women's rights
Abortion rights Ongoing litigation Viability of fetus Precedent of Roe v. Wade State's interest in fetal life |
| gptkbp:legal_reasoning |
Originalism
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Mississippi_Attorney_General
Jackson Women's Health Organization's lawyers |
| gptkbp:legal_scholars'_views |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
Extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Overturned Roe v. Wade
States can regulate abortion |
| gptkbp:political_impact |
2022 midterm elections
State-level abortion legislation Mobilization of voters Shift in political dynamics |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey Reevaluation of legal precedents States have more authority over abortion laws |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justices_Neil_Gorsuch
gptkb:Justice_Amy_Coney_Barrett gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justices_Clarence_Thomas Justices Brett Kavanaugh |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Protests
Support for abortion rights Support for the ruling |
| gptkbp:reactions_from_advocacy_groups |
Mixed responses
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey gptkb:June_Medical_Services_LLC_v._Russo gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_of_Greater_Ohio_v._Hodges gptkb:Gonzales_v._Carhart gptkb:Whole_Woman's_Health_v._Hellerstedt |
| gptkbp:ruled |
States can regulate abortion
|
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Public health implications
Impact on constitutional law Comparative analysis with other countries' laws Ethical considerations in abortion debates Legal scholars' debates Social justice perspectives Legal and ethical implications |
| gptkbp:significance |
Impact on reproductive rights
Constitutional interpretation of privacy rights Major shift in reproductive rights States' rights to legislate on abortion |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|