Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)

GPTKB entity

Statements (23)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299
gptkbp:date 1852
gptkbp:decision upheld state law
gptkbp:defendant Board of Wardens of the Port of Philadelphia
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:John_McLean
gptkb:James_M._Wayne
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens_of_the_Port_of_Philadelphia
gptkbp:heldBy States may regulate aspects of interstate commerce that require local regulation and do not demand national uniformity
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Cooley v. Board of Wardens (1852)
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalIssue Commerce Clause
state regulation of commerce
gptkbp:location gptkb:Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Benjamin_R._Curtis
gptkbp:plaintiff Aaron B. Cooley
gptkbp:predecessor dormant Commerce Clause doctrine
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Dormant_Commerce_Clause
federalism
state police powers
gptkbp:subject pilotage laws
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Cooley_Doctrine
gptkbp:bfsLayer 8