Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
GPTKB entity
Statements (90)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
11-1025
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Civil case
11-1025 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
568 U.S. 398 (2013)
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Discussion on the balance between security and privacy.
Debate on the legality of mass surveillance. Effect on international human rights advocacy. Encouraged legislative reforms on surveillance. Impact on Fourth Amendment rights. Increased scrutiny of intelligence agencies. Influenced public policy on data collection. Raised awareness of digital privacy issues. Influence on public perception of government surveillance. Shaped future litigation strategies for civil rights organizations. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Amnesty_International_USA
gptkb:James_R._Clapper other organizations Reversed lower court's decision Affirmed lower court's dismissal. |
| gptkbp:date |
October 29, 2012
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 26, 2013 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
October 29, 2012
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Debate on civil liberties and national security
Raised concerns about government surveillance Influenced future cases on surveillance and privacy rights. Clarified standards for standing in surveillance cases |
| gptkbp:involvedCountries |
Government agencies
Technology companies Legal scholars Various civil rights organizations |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor Justice Stephen Breyer 5-4 decision |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:Kirkland_&_Ellis_LLP Standing to sue Impact on surveillance law Surveillance and privacy law. Addressed issues of national security and civil liberties. |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
Impact on FISA amendments
Influenced_the_USA_Freedom_Act |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_against_Amnesty_International_USA
The_Court_ruled_that_the_plaintiffs_lacked_standing. |
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Amnesty_International_USA
gptkb:National_Association_of_Criminal_Defense_Lawyers Human Rights Watch Clapper,_James_R. |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Influenced future cases on standing
Set precedent for future surveillance cases. |
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Mixed reactions from civil rights advocates
Support from national security advocates |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Carpenter
gptkb:Smith_v._Maryland gptkb:City_of_Los_Angeles_v._Patel gptkb:Katz_v._United_States gptkb:United_States_v._Jones Constitutional law Public policy Civil liberties National security Surveillance Administrative law Checks and balances Constitutional interpretation Judicial review Separation of powers Government accountability Statutory interpretation Due process Legal advocacy Legal ethics Public interest Legal interpretation Legal remedies Privacy rights Judicial activism Equal protection Judicial restraint Litigation strategy Judicial precedent Legal standing First_Amendment_rights Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act
gptkb:Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Act_(FISA) |