Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case

GPTKB entity

Statements (41)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate September 9, 2009
March 24, 2009
gptkbp:citation 558 U.S. 310
gptkbp:date January 21, 2010
gptkbp:decision Landmark decision
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:followedBy gptkb:SpeechNow.org_v._FEC
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
gptkbp:heldBy Corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court case
gptkbp:impact Led to the creation of Super PACs
Increased political spending by corporations and unions
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalIssue gptkb:First_Amendment
Campaign finance
gptkbp:location gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
Sonia Sotomayor (in part)
gptkbp:mediaCoverage Extensive national and international coverage
gptkbp:overruledBy gptkb:Austin_v._Michigan_Chamber_of_Commerce
McConnell v. FEC (in part)
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:Citizens_United
gptkbp:precededBy gptkb:McConnell_v._FEC
gptkbp:publicReaction Highly controversial
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act
gptkbp:response gptkb:Federal_Election_Commission
gptkbp:subject Corporate personhood
Electioneering communications
Political speech
gptkbp:votingSystem 5-4
gptkbp:website https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Citizens_United
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6