|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
April 25, 1990
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
Constitutional law case
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 30, 1990
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
89-1016
|
|
gptkbp:election
|
6-3
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Influenced state campaign finance laws
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Austin,_Michigan_Chamber_of_Commerce
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
494 U. S. 652 (1990)
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
Political Action Committees (PACs)
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
Campaign finance regulation
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Upheld the constitutionality of Michigan's campaign finance law
|
|
gptkbp:overruled_by
|
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Established limits on corporate political spending
Subsequent campaign finance cases
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Thurgood_Marshall
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
First Amendment rights
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Addressed corporate spending in elections
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|