gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:area
|
Administrative law
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
February 29, 1984
|
gptkbp:citation
|
467 U.S. 837
thousands of federal court decisions
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 25, 1984
|
gptkbp:decision
|
Majority opinion
Unanimous decision
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
82-1005
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Courts must defer to administrative agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes unless they are unreasonable.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Chevron v. NRDC
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Significantly shaped U.S. administrative law
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:Warren_E._Burger
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:legalCitation
|
467 U.S. 837 (1984)
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo
June 28, 2024
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference_doctrine
|
gptkbp:principle
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:King_v._Burwell
gptkb:United_States_v._Mead_Corp.
gptkb:Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Established the two-step Chevron test for judicial review of agency interpretations
|
gptkbp:status
|
Overruled in 2024
|
gptkbp:step
|
If statute is ambiguous, determine whether agency's interpretation is reasonable
Determine whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Statutory_interpretation
Administrative law
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|