Charles T. Schenck v. United States

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
gptkbp:arguedDate	January 9, 1919
gptkbp:category	1919 in United States case law United States free speech case law
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:249_U.S._47 subsequent First Amendment cases
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	March 3, 1919
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:decision	unanimous opinion
gptkbp:docketNumber	437
gptkbp:heldBy	The First Amendment does not protect speech that creates a clear and present danger
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Charles T. Schenck v. United States
gptkbp:impact	limited free speech during wartime
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkbp:overruledBy	gptkb:Brandenburg_v._Ohio
gptkbp:pages	47
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Charles_T._Schenck
gptkbp:predecessor	gptkb:Abrams_v._United_States gptkb:Debs_v._United_States gptkb:Frohwerk_v._United_States
gptkbp:principle	clear and present danger
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Espionage_Act_of_1917 gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:response	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:subject	freedom of speech Espionage Act enforcement wartime dissent
gptkbp:unanimousDecision	true
gptkbp:volume	249
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6