|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:category
|
1919 in United States case law
United States free speech case law
|
|
gptkbp:charge
|
Conspiring to violate the Espionage Act
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:250_U.S._616
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:courtTerm
|
1919 term
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1919-11-10
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Jacob_Abrams_et_al._v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The United States can criminalize speech that poses a clear and present danger to the government during wartime.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Abrams v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Espionage_Act_of_1917
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_John_Hessin_Clarke
|
|
gptkbp:notableFor
|
Holmes' dissent advocating for free speech protections
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Hyman_Lachowsky
gptkb:Jacob_Abrams
gptkb:Jacob_Schwartz
gptkb:Mollie_Steimer
gptkb:Samuel_Lipman
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
First Amendment jurisprudence
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
clear and present danger
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Convictions affirmed
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Clear_and_present_danger_test
gptkb:Dissent_in_Abrams_v._United_States
gptkb:Espionage_Act_of_1917
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|