Properties (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
gptkb:Morris_Cohen gptkb:Jacob_Abrams gptkb:Samuel_Chavkin gptkb:Hyman_Amberg Distributing anti-war leaflets |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
November 10, 1919 |
| gptkbp:focus |
National security
War effort |
| gptkbp:governs |
Prosecution_under_Espionage_Act
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Historical significance
Cultural impact Judicial philosophy Contemporary relevance Influence on civil liberties Constitutional law implications Judicial activism vs. restraint Legal legacy Role in civil rights movement Impact on future legislation Public opinion at the time Critique of judicial reasoning Debate on free speech limits Evolution of free speech doctrine Impact on First Amendment law Influence on modern free speech cases Judicial interpretation of dissent Political context of the ruling Legal_critiques First_Amendment_debates |
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
World War I era
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Abrams v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Free speech jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis Political dissent Free expression Affirmed lower court ruling Marketplace of ideas |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Espionage Act of 1917
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Clear and Present Danger
First_Amendment_rights First_Amendment_interpretation |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
250 U.S. 616
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Conviction upheld
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_William_Howard_Taft
gptkb:Justice_John_Harlan |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent free speech cases
Clear and Present Danger test |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Schenck_v._United_States
gptkb:Gitlow_v._New_York gptkb:Whitney_v._California |