|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
March 25, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
96-1230
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
reversed lower court ruling
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
administrative law case
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 26, 1997
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Auer v. Robbins
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influenced administrative law
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Auer and Robbins
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
519 U. S. 452
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
fair notice of regulations
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
employment law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
deference to agency interpretations
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
interpretation of regulations
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
Court ruled in favor of Robbins
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Auer deference
Auer deference standard
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie
gptkb:Chevron_U._S._A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established standard for agency interpretation
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
4
|