|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
135 S. Ct. 2551
192 L. Ed. 2d 569
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 26, 2015
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
576 U.S. 644 (2015)
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:John_G._Roberts,_Jr.
gptkb:Stephen_G._Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legalHolding
|
The residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Johnson_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
gptkb:James_v._United_States
gptkb:Sykes_v._United_States
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
644
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Samuel_James_Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Armed_Career_Criminal_Act
vagueness doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
576
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:James_Obergefell,_et_al._v._Richard_Hodges,_Director,_Ohio_Department_of_Health,_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|