|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 2014
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2015
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
June 26, 2015
|
|
gptkbp:election
|
8-1
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Johnson v. United States
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
affects sentencing guidelines
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
Samuel Johnson and the United States
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
576 U. S. 591
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
interpretation of 'violent felony'
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
constitutionality of the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Petitioner represented by public defender
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
residual clause declared unconstitutionally vague
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
influenced subsequent cases regarding vagueness
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Dimaya_v._Sessions
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
vagueness doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Davis
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|